On 15 December 2025, Chile elected José Antonio Kast as its next president, delivering a decisive victory to the far right and marking one of the most dramatic ideological shifts since the country’s return to democracy in 1990. Facing him in the runoff was Jeannette Jara, a former labour minister and Communist Party candidate backed by the governing left. The contest was stark, polarised, and emotionally charged, cutting to the heart of competing visions for Chile’s future. At stake was not only who would govern, but what kind of country Chile is becoming, and what its voters now fear most.

After a turbulent first year in government, Labour’s 2025 conference in Liverpool offered Keir Starmer a rare opportunity: to prove his party still has both purpose and pulse. Taking place in Liverpool from the 28th to 30th September, the conference encapsulated a rhetorical shift for Labour. Instead of fighting on Reform UK’s turf, Prime Minister Keir Starmer utilised his speech to mark a clear shift away from this, warning of the ‘toxic divide and decline’ offered by Reform UK that would ‘tear this country apart’. As well as this, the Prime Minister’s speech tallied up Labour’s achievements on key manifesto pledges relating to climate change, education and training, the NHS and safer streets and economic growth. Whilst the Prime Minister along with other key ministers made some fiery speeches, is this reignition too little too late, and will it come to fruition at all?

On 13th July 2025, a protest outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex set off a surge of anti-migrant demonstrations across the country after an asylum seeker being housed there was charged with the sexual assault of a local girl. From Liverpool to Clacton, with the former resulting in 11 arrests, these demonstrations have been simultaneous with large scale counter protests. The debate is volatile, with media coverage often heightening division over immigration, pitting facts against fears and headlines.

65,000 alleged gang members have been detained by the El Salvadorian authorities since the beginning of President Bukele’s ‘National State of Emergency’. By most metrics this policy including sweeping arrests, suspension of certain civil rights, has been incredibly successful. The murder rate, previously one of the highest in the world at 3.67 homicides a day in 2020, is now just 0.31 homicides a day [1]. However, this seemingly miraculous success has come at the expense of human rights. Reports of torture against detainees, imprisonment without trial and enforced disappearances are terrifyingly commonplace, according to Amnesty International [2]. Despite this, popular support for Bukele remains strong, with his approval largely remaining at 80% since the state of emergency was declared in 2022. Other South American nations also in the chokehold of gang violence have attempted to replicate this policy with limited success. Namely, Honduras and Ecuador. Why has El Salvador been so successful when other similar countries failed? Furthermore, is the brutal suppression of its people’s rights morally or legally justified by its dramatic success?

“In trade, as in hockey, Canada will win” . These are the words of Canada’s new Prime Minister, Mark Carney as he took over the leadership of the Liberal Party from Justin Trudeau. Since January, Canada has been facing pressure from an unprecedented enemy (and former ally), the United States. Donald Trump has not only hit Canada with 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium but has also patronised Canada via social media referring to it as ‘our cherished 51st state’ of America. At a time of great turmoil in Canadian politics, two-term PM Justin Trudeau stepped down in the face of increased political pressure. It goes without saying that Canada is facing some exceptional challenges. This political turmoil begs the question, what is next for Canada and is it facing an existential threat from the US? 

On December 8th, 2024, Syrian rebel forces toppled one of the longest established and oppressive autocracies on earth. The Hay ‘at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) rebel group mounted an attack on the Syrian government on the 27th November, shocking the regime, the world and possibly even themselves at the speed in which the offensive managed to take key military targets. The new ‘leader’ of Syria, replacing Bashar Al-Assad who has now claimed asylum in Russia is named Ahmed al-Sharaa (formerly Abu Muhammed Al Gholani). He has assured the world and the Syrian people that his government would be one of stability and fair electoral processes. HTS has sought to reposition itself as a legitimate force, though its past links to Al-Qaeda continue to fuel scepticism among analysts and policymakers. This unprecedented shift in the Syrian Civil War raises lots of questions. Is the civil war now over? Can Syria and the rest of the world trust HTS to deliver upon their word? And how exactly did a rebel offensive topple one of the world’s most notorious dictatorships and police states in just 11 days?

Since 2002, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has reached one final conviction for conflict-related sexual violence. Over the last two decades, there has been an eruption in conflicts across the globe. With this, comes the horrific practice of sexual violence being used by male fighters against female civilian populations. Whilst we can find cases of sexual violence being used in nearly all conflicts throughout history, this is a disturbing subject which those who aren’t involved, tend to look away from. This is somewhat understandable due to the unthinkable, brutal realities women caught in conflicts face daily. However, it is necessary to raise awareness for victims by reporting on this extensively, to cultivate the widespread cultural outrage that gets world leaders to pay attention.